Shanksville Coroner: No Bodies Found at 9/11 ‘Crash’ Site – Not a Single drop of Blood

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +

(Secrets of the Fed) Wallace Miller is the coroner of Somerset County, Pennsylvania. He was among the first people to arrive at the alleged Flight 93 crash site on the morning of 9/11.

I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes, because there were no bodies there. It became like a giant funeral service.

He later recounted to the Washington Post what he’d seen when he first got there: “I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes, because there were no bodies there. It became like a giant funeral service.” (Peter Perl, “Hallowed Ground,” Washington Post, 5/12/2002) Since there were 44 people on board Flight 93, a crash site with “no bodies” makes no sense. Where were the victims? Something appears to have been seriously wrong. Yet Miller now seems to dispute his earlier claim. In the recent BBC documentary 9/11: The Conspiracy Files, he explained: “I said that I stopped being a coroner after about 20 minutes because it was perfectly clear what the cause and manner of death was gonna be.

This is the most eerie thing. I have not, to this day, seen a single drop of blood. Not a drop.

Screen Shot 2015-03-22 at 3.03.08 PM

It was a plane crash but yet it was a homicide because the terrorists hijacked the plane and killed the people, and the terrorists committed suicide. So from that point, yes it was a misquote, because the point that I was trying to make was, after that it more or less became a large funeral service.

The BBC documentary’s producer Guy Smith endorsed this claim, telling Loose Change creator Dylan Avery thatMiller meant his earlier statement only as “a simile. … It looked as if that had happened. … But he didn’t mean that literally.” (9/11: The Conspiracy Files, BBC 2, 2/18/2007)

Was the Washington Post mistaken? Did they “misquote” Wallace Miller? Other reports suggest differently. In the 12 months following 9/11, Miller in fact described the surprising lack of human remains at the Flight 93 crash site, repeatedly and unequivocally: He told author David McCall: “I got to the actual crash site and could not believe what I saw. … Usually you see much debris, wreckage, and much noise and commotion. This crash was different. There was no wreckage, no bodies, and no noise. … It appeared as though there were no passengers or crew on this plane.” (David McCall, From Tragedy to Triumph, 2002, pp. 86-87)

He told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: “It was as if the plane had stopped and let the passengers off before it crashed.” (Tom Gibb, “Newsmaker: Coroner’s quiet unflappability helps him take charge of Somerset tragedy,” Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 10/15/2001)

He told CNN: “It was a really a very unusual site. You almost would’ve thought the passengers had been dropped off somewhere. … Even by the standard model of an airplane crash, there was very little, even by those standards.” (CNN, 3/11/2002)

Author Jere Longman wrote: “Wallace Miller, the Somerset County coroner, arrived and walked around the [crash]site with [assistant volunteer fire chief Rick]King. … They walked around for an hour and found almost no human remains. ‘If you didn’t know, you would have thought no one was on the plane,” Miller said. “You would have thought they dropped them off somewhere.”” (Jere Longman, Among the Heroes, 2002, p. 217)

Recalling the crash scene, Miller told the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review: “This is the most eerie thing. I have not, to this day, seen a single drop of blood. Not a drop.” (Robb Frederick, “The day that changed America,” Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, 9/11/2002)

Australian newspaper The Age reported: “Miller was familiar with scenes of sudden and violent death, although none quite like this. Walking in his gumboots, the only recognisable body part he saw was a piece of spinal cord, with five vertebrae attached. ‘I’ve seen a lot of highway fatalities where there’s fragmentation,’ Miller said. ‘The interesting thing about this particular case is that I haven’t, to this day, 11 months later, seen any single drop of blood. Not a drop. The only thing I can deduce is that the crash was over in half a second. There was a fireball 15-20 metres high, so all of that material just got vaporised.’” (“On Hallowed Ground,” The Age, 9/9/2002)

It would be ridiculous to claim that these accounts were all ‘misquotes.’ Furthermore, several other witnesses also made the same observation, and later said they saw virtually no human remains at the Flight 93 crash site: According to the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, when former firefighter Dave Fox arrived at the scene, “He saw a wiring harness, and a piston. None of the other pieces was bigger than a TV remote. He saw three chunks of torn human tissue. He swallowed hard. ‘You knew there were people there, but you couldn’t see them,’ he says.” (Robb Frederick, “The day that changed America,” Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, 9/11/2002)

Where is the plane?

Local FBI agent Wells Morrison told author Glenn Kashurba what he saw when he arrived at the crash site: “We arrived in the immediate area and walked up to the crater and the burning woods. My first thought was, ‘Where is the plane?’ Because most of what I saw was this honeycomb looking stuff, which I believe is insulation or something like that. I was not seeing anything that was distinguishable either as human remains or aircraft debris.” (Glenn Kashurba, Courage After the Crash, 2002, p. 110)

After hearing a plane was down nearby, Jeff Phillips, who worked at Stoystown Auto Wreckers, “left work to locate the crash site,” along with a colleague. “But when we arrived,” he says, “Almost nothing was recognizable. The only thing we saw that was even remotely human was half a shoe that was probably ten feet from the impact area.” (David McCall, From Tragedy to Triumph, 2002, pp. 29-30)

Jon Meyer, a reporter with WJAC-TV, says: “We were so early that they hadn’t had a chance to set up a barrier for the press. … I was able to get right up to the edge of the crater. … All I saw was a crater filled with small, charred plane parts. … There were no suitcases, no recognizable plane parts, no body parts.”(Newseum, Running Toward Danger, 2002, p. 148)

Faye Hahn, an EMT, responded to the first reports of the crash. She says: “Several trees were burned badly and there were papers everywhere. We searched. … I was told that there were 224 passengers, but later found out that there were actually forty. I was stunned. There was nothing there.” (David McCall, From Tragedy to Triumph, 2002, pp. 31-32)

Despite this absence of human remains at the Flight 93 crash scene, the Washington Post reported: “The 33 passengers, seven crew and four hijackers together weighed roughly 7,000 pounds. … Hundreds of searchers who climbed the hemlocks and combed the woods for weeks [after 9/11]were able to find about 1,500 mostly scorched samples of human tissue totaling less than 600 pounds, or about 8 percent of the total.” (Peter Perl, “Hallowed Ground,” Washington Post, 5/12/2002)

By December 19, 2001, “the remains of the 40 passengers and crew, and, by process of elimination, the four hijackers” had all been identified. (Steve Levin, “Flight 93 victims’ effects to go back to families,” Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 12/30/2001)

Source: Secrets of the Fed

Share.

7 Comments

  1. This was such a terrible tragedy for so many and for the country. So much does not make sense in this account. For example, how come there were papers everywhere (according to EMT worker and early responder, I believe) if the heat were so intense the victims and even airplane parts were “vaporized.”?

    • It’s a phenomenon called “Bullshit”. It’s the same phenomenon that allows a hijacker’s passport to pass through the fuselage of an airliner, through a massive fireball, and land unscathed on the street below for easy identification. It’s also the same phenomenon that allows an airliner to be completely vaporized by intense heat yet the passengers intact enough to be identified by fingerprints. You just can’t make this stuff up. How the hell does the majority of the population believe this nonsense?

    • Paper weighs next to nothing and catches air with ease. Ironically enough, we saw some of these properties from paper being expelled from the planes crashing into the towers.

      Depending on where these papers were, it’s entirely possible they survived the resulting conflagration by being expelled from any of the fractures that dissolved the plane into component parts on any of the extremely powerful air currents created by the violence of impact + the eruption of the fuel fighting it out. Bear in mind that all of this happened within a tiny matter of seconds or quicker. We also have no clue how many papers were not so lucky as the ones that did survive. They may have been inside of a decently made suitcase, or a metal supply locker. There are literally dozens or more possibilities to explain why there were any left to speak of.

      People, on the other hand, weigh about as much in comparison to paper as a mountain does to us. And, in a normal situation everyone would have been buckled in, which would have probably helped keep the bodies close to the site. Pilots would also be doing everything they could to slow the plane down and to smooth out the descent/landing. Who can say how many of these normal qualities were in play and to what degree? This plane came in so fast and so hard that there wasn’t even a plane left. People, buckled in or not, would have been shot through a haze of metal shards and burning plastics with incomprehensible force. Even their chairs didn’t survive. A cloud of shrapnel becomes a wall of shrapnel when a human body is forced through it that fast. Actual parts of the plane coming into contact with a person would be like having part of them fall off a tall building and pop/break apart on landing. All bones would break on initial impact, effectively filling the body with gravel. Heat, intense speed/momentum, and metal/plastic EVERYWHERE in the form chairs and walls and flying metal carts are all a plane needs to become a people blender. The ground, the trees, nature itself would have claimed what little genetic material was left, and some was indeed found veeery far from the site. Which is what you would look for in a crash of that magnitude.

      I fully believe 9/11 was a false flag operation and called it as such on the very day, which was the day after my 15th birthday XD I didn’t even know X-files had predicted not just 9/11 6 months before it happened, but claimed it would the American government creating a path to war in the Middle East to control their oil – or, maybe, to destabilize the region in order to create more demand and to weaken the unfriendly competition. I doubt Bush or his family felt the global economic depression he created, at the expense of trillions of dollars and his country’s stability.

      But, this part of the mystery can be explained with ease. Body parts were not found at the scene, but they were found. The magnitude and vastly unusual quality of the crash leaves far too many variables to account for, and emotions and personal opinion create invested reactions of bias which must be met with reason and compassion 🙂 Hope this helped!

  2. Daniel Guillot on

    I see nothing unusual about that,,,as a police officer and an E M T I have worked two large plane crashes and in both not all the bodies were accounted for,,,,and in both there was little or no blood,,,

    • But there were bodies, correct? This coroner is saying there were zero bodies found. Are you saying that’s not unusual?