British Film Destroys Official 9/11 Story

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +

Dear Readers,

I don’t suppose that any of you are sufficiently gullible to belive the official 9/11 fairy tale. If some of you are still trapped within the Matrix, here is a two hour British film that should spring you free.

From my standpoint the problem of this film is not its veracity. The problem with the film is that
on occasion film-making technique gets precedence over clarity of explanation.

Another problem is that the film director forgets that he is presenting a false flag event when he criticizes authorities for not arresting the perpetrators prior to the event. If 9/11 was a false flag
event, there are no terrorist perpetrators to have arrested.

— Paul Craig Roberts

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts’ latest books are The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the WestHow America Was Lost, and The Neoconservative Threat to World Order.

INCONTROVERTIBLE – New 9/11 Documentary by Tony Rooke

INCONTROVERTIBLE is the first and only feature length documentary we have which portrays the frank and candid views of Police Officers, Firefighters and Soldiers as they express their grave concerns about the official explanation for the events of 9/11. The film is intended to act as a practical aid in combating the mainstream media’s propaganda and outright lies concerning the attacks on September 11th 2001.

This film is intended to be viewed by Police Officers, Firefighters and all those serving in the Armed Forces as they are the among the best placed members of our society to have the ability to change things for the better. If you have friends or family who are serving then please pass this film onto them.

“All family members of a 9/11 victim should watch this film.”

Matt Campbell – Brother of Geoff, killed in WTC1

“Incontrovertible is technically brilliant.”

Ian Henshall – Author – ‘9/11 Revealed’ and ‘9/11 The New Evidence’

“Moving, powerful and informative.”

Niels Harrit – Veteran Truth Campaigner

“Absolutely first rate! The film manages to navigate the broad aspects of 9/11, with all the complexity, and even tie it with 7/7 and JFK, while avoiding the pitfalls of discredited speculative theories. I have no hesitation in sharing this with anyone.”

David Chandler, retired physics teacher

“Artfully crafted – manages to convince cumulatively that there are still questions to answer.”

Joe Gill – Journalist – Middle East Eye

“One of the best 911 movies ever made!”

Kevin Barrett – Truth Jihad Radio

More Information →

Via: Paul Craig Roberts


1 Comment

  1. Thermal and kinetic energy weapons of any kind (e.g. jetfuel, airplanes, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs) are a very inaccurate and unscientific explanation for what destroyed the WTC buildings on 9/11. Explosives/thermite would be disproven in a court of law very rapidly because they are not consistent with the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11, and this would set a legal precedent that could potentially prevent justice from ever being obtained.

    There is only a small amount of weaker evidence, mostly personal testimony, which suggests that thermite or explosives were used on 9/11. In contrast, there is a very large, robust body of both empirical and testimonial evidence suggesting that explosives were NOT used on 9/11. Most importantly, the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 can only be explained by one thing, a general category of weapon technology known as ‘directed energy weapons’.

    This table briefly summarizes and compares the various explanations that attempt to address the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 (table from Dr. Judy Wood’s presentation at the 2012 ‘Breakthrough Energy Movement’ conference in Holland).
    Source: &

    Thermal and kinetic energy weapons of any kind (e.g. jetfuel, airplanes, explosives, thermite, nuclear bombs) are not consistent with the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11. Again, most evidence in support of thermite or explosives is testimonial in nature, such as witnesses “hearing explosions” or “seeing molten liquid”. Testimonial evidence is the weakest form of evidence because people are often mistaken, biased, and/or repeating things they heard from others. Please keep in mind that loud, explosive noises can be caused by many things, and it is very likely that items were independently exploding as the buildings were transformed to dust. Please also keep in mind that glowing objects or liquids do not directly imply hot or molten steel, as many objects can glow or melt under lower stresses and temperatures. As for the tiny amount of empirical evidence for thermite, such as the Bentham Open Access ‘peer-reviewed’ study that allegedly found thermite in WTC dust samples, this could be explained by many common, logical things, some of which are discussed at the links below.

    Thermic Lances Used To Cut Steel Beams during WTC Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths:

    Copper thermite is used for creating electric joints in building construction (‘cadwelding’):

    Cad Weld – Copper Ground to Rebar:

    Steven Jones proves primer paint, not thermite:

    Bentham Open Access Publishing Accepts Nonsense Manuscript for Dollars:

    Bentham Science Publishing Editors Quit After Fake Paper Accepted:

    No Thermite on 9/11?! | Thermite Does NOT Explain the Evidence!

    WTC Steel Columns Cut at Angles During 9/11 Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths:

    9/11 Ground Zero Molten Steel or Work Lights? | 9/11 Myths:

    9/11 “Pull It” WTC Building Demolition via Pulling Cables | 9/11 Myths:

    9/11 WTC Explosive Demolition is NOT Supported by the Evidence | 9/11 Myths:

    Melting Aluminum In The Foundry:

    Aluminum Glows:

    Thermite and Glowing Liquid Aluminum (Section IV):

    Andrew Johnson’s Evidence-Packed ‘Thermite Free 9/11’ page:

    Even Richard Gage, the leader of AE911Truth, admitted to me that thermite does not explain the empirical evidence from 9/11, and that he has not studied the important NYC seismographic data. In addition, he lies to the public and refuses to address the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 that thermite does not explain. Luckily, I got his suspicious behavior and responses on video when I questioned him at a presentation in Peoria, IL when I was attending medical school there. See for yourself (he admits to those things in Part 2):

    Richard Gage Questioned at AE911Truth Presentation (4/12/2011) by Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez
    *Part 1/2:
    *Part 2/2:

    Please study the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 including University of Alaska magnetometer data, Columbia University NYC seismographic data, United States Geological Survey (USGS) dust analysis, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) AVIRIS thermal imaging, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) AVIRIS dust and iron (ferrous/ferric) spectrometer imaging, WTC1 & 2 steel turning to dust in midair, WTC1 ‘lathering up’, WTC7 ‘lathering up’, WTC2 ‘sillystring’ trails, WTC1 & 2 minimal seismic impact, WTC7 minimal seismic impact, WTC lack of P-wave seismic signal, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) verified Hurricane Erin (category 3), WTC1 & 2 rapid speed of destruction, WTC1 & 2 top-down direction of destruction, WTC7 ‘free fall’ destruction, disappearance of most of WTC4, vertical cylindrical holes in surrounding WTC buildings, relative lack of rubble compared to explosive controlled demolitions, lack of major damage to surrounding non-WTC buildings other than Bankers Trust, rapid spontaneous rusting of metals, Bankers Trust rapid spontaneous rusting, Bankers Trust warped metal beams, 1400+ ‘toasted’ and warped cars up to 1/2 mile away, numerous flipped cars, spontaneous ‘weird’ fires, ground zero fuming for years without high heat, truck loads of fresh dirt being hauled in and out of ground zero for years, numerous unharmed survivors in WTC stairwells, mostly undamaged WTC shopping mall, mostly undamaged PATH trains, mostly undamaged WTC ‘Bathtub’ foundation, presence of dust ‘fuzzballs’, strange round window holes, shriveled steel beams, strangely curved steel beams, wavy steel beams, vertical axis ‘rolling up’ of steel beams, thinning of steel beams, holes in steel beams, objects fusing with unburned paper, missing file cabinets, missing office machinery, missing office furniture, missing toilets, missing door knobs, lack of high heat, cool temperature of WTC dust, unburned paper, unburned clothing, unburned pedestrians, elevated levels of tritium, lack of ionizing radiation, glowing and molten materials, spontaneous explosion of Scott air tanks, numerous similarities between ‘The Hutchison Effect’ and phenomena observed at ground zero, and much more.

    The large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 is overwhelmingly conclusive, because there is only one thing that can explain it all, and nothing else comes close. Only the general category of weapon technology known as ‘directed energy weapons’ (DEW) can explain all of the empirical evidence from 9/11, and it does so completely and irrefutably. Please study the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 in great detail, for our entire planet and everything on it will benefit if you do.



    Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez, M.D.
    PGY3 Neurological Surgery
    B.S. Biology/Neurobiology