By Shem El-Jamal
The modern scientific establishment has progressed far beyond where it is said to have been at the turn of the last century. Throughout the years, there have been numerous discoveries and advancements on the theoretical and the applied side of science and development. Yet even with this notable progress, it seems that the current Western scientific establishment has missed the mark in multiple ways.
During the twenty-first century, the public side of science brought us the inventions of the transistor, the microprocessor, antibiotics, the automobile, LEDs, smartphones, space travel and many other relatively impressive developments. These advancements in science and technology have changed the lives of countless individuals, yet at the same time, when it comes to the true capacity for scientific progress, these developments may only represent a small fraction of the true scope of scientific potential.
It may not have been that scientists themselves held any conscious intent to behave counterproductively to their own profession or the education of the general public. However, in many ways, it does appear that at some level of either science or scientific publication, there has been an active attempt to censor the true scope of scientific and technological advancement—both on and off planet.
According to research, there have been extensive clandestine efforts to suppress and maintain secrecy of the plethora of classified projects which military and corporate entities have undergone over the decades. Simply put, on a number of levels, the scientific establishment has been coerced into settling for the informational leftovers which classified projects no longer need.
According to multiple whistleblower testimonies, this establishment of secrecy has been the regular M.O. of these projects since their conception in the mid-1900s.
This secrecy has been particularly prevalent in the arena of astronomy and the discoveries therein. We may even notice the evidence of this secrecy in action when we compare the stark contrast between the scientific narratives which were promoted a decade ago to those which are being promoted now.
Only a decade ago, the topics of UFOs, of ETs and life on other planets, and alternative human history were all considered to be so ridiculous that virtually no scientific publication would dare touch them without having a hearty laugh. Now suddenly, all of these topics are being considered worthy of extensive study.
This is not at all ordinary within the world of scientific research, and many believe this apparent turn of focus on a proverbial dime indicates the possibility that at some level, “someone” already knew these topics were valid and substantial. However, due to the (alleged) choice by certain clandestine interests to maintain blanket secrecy, the public side of science ignored them.
We will discuss more on these subjects in a moment. Right now, let’s consult what could be considered one of the most revealing articles to be published in mainstream media in a long while. This is Business Insider with a remarkable discussion of a scientific discovery about the asteroid belt within our solar system. Per the typical rhetoric of such disclosures, the discovery is claimed to be “new.”
Source: Business Insider
Published: July 9, 2018
By: Christiane Imdahl
Researchers Have Found Remarkable Remains of Destroyed Planets in Space
- A study in Nature Astronomy has published details of findings after it discovered an asteroid belt wasn’t just made of asteroids.
- On further examination, it transpired that the asteroid belt contained fragments of planets.
- The findings are significant, in that they could assist us in understanding more about the evolution of our own planet.
A study in Nature Astronomy has detailed how a group of researchers stumbled upon something remarkable in an asteroid belt — it turns out that large chunks deviating from the belt are not just rock fragments that never developed into planets; rather, they’re remnants of existing planets.
Researchers were actually investigating the asteroids in order to predict possible collisions with Earth — towards which the belt is headed — and to clarify what’s causing them to leave the belt at all, but they weren’t prepared for what they would find.
For many years, astronomers assumed that the belt, which orbits the sun between Mars and Jupiter, was simply made up of standard asteroids — but, on closer inspection, the researchers found that most of the approximately 500,000 components are slanted in shape. This means they’re of a completely different composition than previously thought.
There could originally have been at least five planets
One of the researchers involved, Stanley Dermott, spoke about the findings, saying: “We couldn’t think of any forces acting to produce that distribution. If a big asteroid is smashed up and has a high inclination, then those fragments have that same inclination.”
The scientists managed to conclude that the remains from the asteroid belt were once planets of their own, so-called “planetesimals”, estimating that there could have been at least five.
This changes what we’d previously assumed and brings to light other theories on the formation of planets. Until now, most researchers assumed planets grew over time. However, scientist[s]at the Southwest Research Institute David Nesvorny put forward the following theory: “It means asteroids are born big.”
Nesvorny and some of his colleagues believe that the attraction begins as soon as a circumstellar disc grows to a “siliceous” size. More and more matter creates new planets, at least in the inner solar system — in fact, this is what happened in the Earth’s formation.
“What’s needed for the formation of a planet like Earth?”
The peculiar thing is that, between Mars and Jupiter, planets struggle to develop as the forces in that area are so strong, they’re prevented from doing so. As a result, they’re left broken and end up forming part of the asteroid belt we’re familiar with today.
Other scientists point out that this theory would hold more water if we were to assume there had originally been more than five planets. What’s more, the rest of the asteroid belt would have to be investigated — not just the inner area.
Read more at: BusinessInsider.com
We might keep in mind, the fact that whistleblowers from within the alternative community have been stating this very concept in great detail for years now. Yet the establishment, up until this point, has chosen to remain silent about these concepts. We might also keep in mind that according to these whistleblowers, there is much more truth to uncover regarding this story.
It seems apparent from the rapid disclosure of formerly ridiculed ideas, that the scientific establishment and various MSM publishers have been prompted to begin disclosing the hidden aspects of science. The revealing part about the entire endeavor is that these establishments appear to be disclosing all of these seemingly sci-fi truths all at the exact same time—within a span of only five to ten years. Many believe this is proof that there has, in fact, been a blanket of secrecy imposed upon the general public, and personally speaking, I would have to agree.
We might find it interesting to see that the author chose to remain a bit vague in their speech—saying an asteroid belt as opposed to the asteroid belt most of those privy to such topics might refer to. Throughout the article, it is as though the author is subtly tiptoeing around the subject instead of simply jumping right in.
The article only begins to approach the idea that the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter ever held any other form than a chaotic cluster of space debris. This apparent and long-running scientific perspective was similar to that of the planet Mars up until a number of years ago. (We will cover the subject of Martian history in a moment.)
Censorship and Deliberate Ignorance
Very little has been discussed about the asteroid belt in conventional science and media. The belt is littered with rocks ranging in size from that of pebbles to that of small cities. To add, this belt is dotted with actual spherical planetoids, and when we combine all of these factors, we come to a realization.
We may realize the simple fact that valid science does not typically avoid responsible consideration of unexplored possibilities to this degree without being compromised in some way. To add, it’s difficult to imagine why an intelligent species would be presented with so many suggestive clues of possibility without seriously and consciously considering those possibilities, unless, in some way, they were overtly discouraged from doing so.
When a scientific establishment is presented with multiple earths’ worth of massive space rocks, a variety of moon-sized planets, and multiple oceans’ worth of frozen water in the form of comets, and yet refuses to seriously consider the likelihood that these fragments once composed one or more actual planetary bodies in our solar system, we know the likelihood that at some level, someone is not being completely honest. Yet for whatever reason, the scientific establishment has chosen to ignore this evidence for decades on end.
We have asked this question many times, but for the sake of discussion, why is it that scientific convention is suddenly exploring revolutionary ideas now—ideas which were religiously ignored, scoffed at, and ridiculed just a few years ago? These were concepts which according to the conventional scientific response, held no value at all. Yet suddenly, within a span of only five or so years, they are a hot topic.
Was it true that the scientific establishment did not have the sense to perform actual science on the subjects of space, or was there some other factor which has dissuaded conventional astronomers from fully performing their job description?
Was there some outside influence that was acting as a scientific censure which prevented key and possibly vital information from making its way into the public eye? According to whistleblowers, the answer is a resounding yes.
Not only does this appear to be true, but it also appears that whatever censorship may have been imposed upon the scientific establishment is being systematically removed so that real science can be achieved and disclosed. However, this raises even further questions.
If there was truly an issue of blanket censorship over various fields of science, how do we know that what we are receiving now represents the entire story? How do we know if all of the censorship has been lifted and that what we are seeing now represents complete forthrightness from an establishment which has built a solid reputation of partiality, secrecy, and omitted data?
According to whistleblower testimony, the secrecy was never initiated by actual scientists. Though it would be a nice gesture for scientists to give their honest commentary on why so many subjects are suddenly being evaluated as opposed to being laughed at, it does not appear that actual scientists have had any malicious intent behind their lack of interest in our solar system.
Multiple whistleblowers and researchers claim that the secrecy we have witnessed coming from scientific publication is dictated by the classified world of military and corporately contracted establishments. These institutions are said to only receive the informational leftovers after classified projects have monopolized most of the interesting information (as previously stated). This is why so much of conventional science has chosen to ignore so many key points of study until now, according to testimony.
Changes of Pace
It is very interesting to see such scientific interest taken in matters which were formerly uninteresting to the scientific community. Up until now, the scientific consensus was that there was no way for the asteroid belt to have been anything else than a cluster of space rocks. They claimed that there was not enough variety of material in the belt to form a planet. Now suddenly, that is no longer true.
Similarly, before the year 2014, the scientific narrative refused to publish any suggestion that Mars held any potential that it was any different than the baron and largely desolate condition in which we now find it. Then suddenly in 2015, the scientific community did a complete one-eighty and admitted that Mars used to be covered in water. Almost half of the planet surface was covered by oceans that were up to a mile deep, according to current scientific theories.
The time it took for the scientific community to completely change its mind was virtually instantaneous. This is not—nor has it ever been—normal within the scientific establishment, particularly because any valid theory takes years to establish and prove plausible.
The rapid disclosure of the reality of the Martian oceans proved the possibility that at some level the scientific establishment—possibly at NASA or a similar military-run organization—knew for a long while that Mars used to have oceans. However, this establishment may have been pressured into keeping this secret while discouraging any other organizations from studying the data on their own.
What Can We Gather?
We might see these rapid changes in established scientific narratives and consider the possibility that an end goal of some kind is in play. It may be that we are simply being handed the idea that the asteroid belt consisted of one or more planets, but in reality, the notion that there was a planetary body in the place of the asteroid belt was well-known beforehand.
Perhaps this gradual acclamation to greater levels of scientific truth is being slowly introduced to the public—possibly with the goal of preparing humanity for even greater levels of revelation. According to whistleblowers and independent researchers, this is actually the intent behind the rapid change in established narratives in astronomy.
Note: Keep an eye out for Part II of this post on the subject of the asteroid belt and the history of our solar system. The information on this topic is actually so extensive that it needed to be spread out in multiple articles as opposed to one. If it were not, the post would be a lot longer than most may be able to handle in one sitting. Thanks for reading! Look forward to more.
This article (MAINSTREAM DISCLOSURE: The Asteroid Belt Now Believed by Astronomers to be Remains of Several Planets (Or Possibly One)) was originally published on Discerning the Mystery and syndicated by The Event Chronicle.